Re: [pressgang] Cliffhangers - good or bad?

Laura Nunn (Laura@salmo.demon.co.uk)
Sat, 6 Jun 1998 12:07:20 +0100

• Next message: Constance Lever-Tracy: "Re: [pressgang] "Please explain" TAC"
• Previous message: Pookes06@aol.com: "Re: [pressgang] "Please explain" TAC"
• Maybe in reply to: sbaskett: "[pressgang] "Please explain" TAC"
• Next in thread: Vince Deehan: "Re: [pressgang] Cliffhangers - good or bad?"

I
>Why is it a cliche? The newsroom is destroyed and the future is
>uncertain. The only thing I didn't like about the ending was that if
>she did survive, Lynda made it seem as if they would not have any more
>troubles. Everything worked out great even though the newsroom was
>destroyed. It would be great if that were true, but that was a little
>too neat for an ending.
>

The thing that bothered me was the way Spike justified Lynda's death by
saying: "The firemen said no-one could've got out".

So, they didn't hang round to look for a body then? Just seems a little
unlikely. But then I'm picky. I just think Spike would know for sure
whether or not Lynda had been killed.

-- 
Laura
-- 
  T H E   P R E S S   G A N G   M A I L I N G   L I S T
  By default, pressing 'reply' will send mail back to the list, not
    to the author of the message you're replying to.
  To unsubscribe e-mail: pressgang-unsubscribe@lists.yoyo.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: pressgang-help@lists.yoyo.org






Next message: Constance Lever-Tracy: "Re: [pressgang] "Please explain" TAC"
Previous message: Pookes06@aol.com: "Re: [pressgang] "Please explain" TAC"
Maybe in reply to: sbaskett: "[pressgang] "Please explain" TAC"

Next in thread: Vince Deehan: "Re: [pressgang] Cliffhangers - good or bad?"





Date view
Thread view
Subject view
Author view







This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 
on Fri Sep 18 1998 - 02:42:34 BST